Justice Jackson raises eyebrows with ‘questionable’ comparison in major case

1
102
IMAGE ABOVE FROM VIDEO BELOW

TOP COMMENTS FROM VIDEO BELOW

This is EXACTLY why you don’t put someone on the court that can’t define what a woman is.

She’s an activist and has no place on the SCOTUS. She’s an embarrassment to the Court.

1 COMMENT

  1. What an embarrassment to SCOTUS! Perhaps she’s more fitted to be on BROADWAY and make an even bigger embarrassment of herself and the court. Makes one wonder how she ever passed exams, doesn’t it? Wonder if she’s learned what a woman is yet. Typical Magoo appointment. An embarrassment!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.